The question "Why are women not held responsible for aqila, that is, for paying the blood-money?" cannot be answered without understanding the balance of financial responsibility in Islamic law. At first glance it may look as though women are being excluded; yet the matter is not a lack of rights but an exemption from a heavy financial burden.
The DuaMio Wisdom approach here does the following: it first clarifies the ruling, then shows the context, then carries the wisdom into a language today's reader can understand.
Short answer: Exempt when paying, entitled when receiving
This balance must be stated plainly: a woman is exempt when heavy compensation is paid out; when her own relative is harmed, she is a rightful claimant. This is a principle that protects women from economic risk. Islam grants women the right to own property; but it places the burden of family maintenance, nafaqah, and heavy collective compensation on the man.
The ruling layer: What is the aqila system?
In Islamic criminal law, the punishment for intentional killing is qisas. But in killing by mistake (unintentional killing), diyah (compensation) is paid to the victim's family. The basis of this ruling is the Qur'an:
"It is not for a believer to kill a believer except by mistake. And whoever kills a believer by mistake - then the freeing of a believing slave and a compensation payment presented to the deceased's family [is required], unless they give [up their right as] charity…"
- From Surah An-Nisa, verse 92 (Sahih International - quran.com)
In fiqh, this diyah is paid jointly by the perpetrator's paternal male relatives, known as the "aqila" (the asaba). Women are not included in this payment group.
The context layer: From blood feud to justice
In the pre-Islamic era, tribal partisanship meant that when a person was killed, innocents could also be killed, and blood feuds dragged on indefinitely. Islam ordered this system with justice: qisas for intentional killing, and a model of compensation and solidarity for killing by mistake. The aqila system spread the heavy financial burden - one that the perpetrator could not bear alone - across a wide network of solidarity.
The wisdom layer: Economic protection
In Islam, nafaqah and family maintenance are the man's responsibility. A woman may own her own property; but she is not obliged to support her family or to pay heavy compensation arising from someone else's mistake. For this reason, exempting a woman from aqila payments is not a deficiency in her but her economic protection.
Women are rightful claimants when receiving
There is a powerful example showing that the exemption is not one-sided: when a woman's husband is killed by mistake, she receives a share of her husband's diyah as an heir. Indeed, the Prophet ruled that the widow of Ashyam ibn Dibabi al-Dabbi should be given an inheritance share from her husband's diyah:
"The Prophet (peace be upon him) ruled that the wife of Ashyam ibn Dibabi should be given her share as an heir from her husband's blood-money (diyah)."
- Abu Dawud, Fara'id 18 (no. 2927); Tirmidhi, Fara'id 18 (no. 2110); Ibn Majah, Fara'id 12; Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Musnad III/452 - via Amr ibn Shu'ayb from his father from his grandfather (hasan-sahih)
In other words, a woman is exempt from paying the heavy premium; but her right to receive a share of the compensation is preserved.
The balance of benefit and burden
In Islamic law, rights and responsibilities are thought of together. Because the man carries more financial responsibility in certain areas, some heavy financial obligations are also placed on him. The woman, in turn, receives mahr, receives inheritance, keeps her own property, and is exempt from heavy collective payments such as diyah. This is not merely a matter of "shares"; it is an entire system of economic protection.
A modern insurance analogy
The aqila system can be compared to a broad liability or accident insurance. When large compensation arises from a mistake, the burden does not rest on the individual's shoulders; it is spread across a network of solidarity. The woman is exempted from this heavy "premium"; but in the case of harm, she may receive a share of the compensation.
The asaba structure and the context of An-Nisa 92
The aqila system rests on the perpetrator's paternal male relatives, known as the asaba. In traditional society, tribal defence, external risks, and financial solidarity ran largely through this male asaba structure; for this reason, the heavy compensation arising from killing by mistake was also distributed across this circle. In the context of An-Nisa 92, the matter of diyah and expiation aims both to secure the victim's right and to lighten, through social solidarity, a burden the perpetrator could not bear alone. Not including women in this group does not diminish their legal personhood; it is consistent with their exemption from heavy burdens such as nafaqah and household maintenance. The point is not "a woman cannot pay" but "let a woman not be economically crushed by a collective compensation burden arising from someone else's mistake."
Recognising the measure
At the heart of the matter is this: Islamic law is conceived as a "rights-and-burdens package"; not placing the heavy collective compensation burden on a woman gains its meaning within the same system that preserves her right to receive a share of the diyah. An-Nisa 92 says that a killing by mistake requires a heavy expiation and compensation; fiqh distributes this burden to the asaba through the aqila; and the sunnah, with the hadith of Ashyam ibn Dibabi, secures a woman's right to stand on the victim's side of the compensation. The modern language of equality says "the same burden in every area"; Islam says "the appropriate burden in every area and, in return, the appropriate right." Today's logic of liability insurance is close to this picture too: the community pays the premium, the one in need receives the compensation. When one turns to the woman and asks, "Why don't you pay?" the answer is plain: because the system has been set up not with a premium that would drag her into economic ruin, but with a right to compensation from which she may benefit when in need.
Summary
Women's non-participation in diyah payment within the aqila system is not a lack of rights but an exemption from a financial burden. A woman is protected from the risk of payment; when she is the one harmed, she may receive a share of the diyah. This is part of Islam's balanced approach that protects women against economic risk.
The question is not: "If a woman is not included in the aqila, is she excluded?"
The real question is:
"Is being exempted from heavy compensation arising from someone else's mistake an exclusion, or is it a shield that protects the woman from economic ruin - while, when she herself is harmed, her right to receive a share of the diyah still stands?"
DuaMio Wisdom Series
Wonder. Understand. Live.
Image note: The images in this article are license-cleared stock images chosen to suit the subject. Each image's source and license are noted in its media description.
Content note: This article was compiled with AI assistance based on reliable sources; Quran verses are quoted verbatim from the approved translation (Sahih International for English), and the article was reviewed editorially and for religious sensitivity before publication.
